Irrelevant Media

When the New Yorker magazine consciously rescinds an invitation to Steve Bannon to one of its’ high profile events, ostensibly for commercial and editorial reasons, why should the publication be taken seriously in future public discourse?

These invitations to polarising figures aren’t proffered on a whim, they are extended because someone at the top of the media organisation thinks Bannon will be an object of serious interest to their audience. That the other liberal-minded speakers don’t agree and won’t be seen on the same stage, says more about them than Bannon.

Perhaps the publication is seeking to return to its’ roots, a “fifteen-cent comic paper”, not the self-styled, “most influential magazine in the world….that stands apart for its commitment to truth and accuracy, for the quality of its prose, and for its insistence on exciting and moving every reader”?

Leave a Reply