Posts Tagged ‘building relationships’

Rushing To Business

Wednesday, May 8th, 2019

In M&A advisory, it is hard to form partnerships in success with sellers of businesses, when you coerce them into signing mandates and accepting terms without first building a trusting relationship and reaching conceptual agreement on their desired outcomes and the improvement in their condition.

Just as founders and entrepreneurs need a “blueprint” for selling their business, so do those seeking to advise them.

If you insist on pulling out the exact same club on every tee, without looking at the layout of the hole in front of you and the other factors that might impact on where the ball lands, little wonder that more often than not your ball finds immediate “trouble”.

Is that the type of expertise you’d hire if the roles were reversed?

12 Signs That You Have Lost Control of The Investor Discussion

Friday, May 3rd, 2019
  1. You are talking about funding terms and conditions before you have framed the investor’s objectives
  2. The investor continues to ask questions about your credibility long after your first conversation.
  3. The investor feigns interest with anecdotes of his or her own past experiences and seeks to point you to a “dead-end” road.
  4. The investor routinely allows (or makes arranged) disruptions to your meeting, by their assistant, colleagues or to take “urgent” phone calls.
  5. The investor cuts short your meeting or arranges for a subordinate to step in at short notice.
  6. You are pushed into a position by the investor of constantly defending your investment thesis, your IP, or your technology rather than discussing how you might work as partners in success.
  7. You are doing more than a third of the talking.
  8. You are treated as a subordinate in the investor meeting (body language and talk).
  9. The investor refuses to engage in a conversation about his or her desired outcomes as it pertains to your investment needs. (“It is too early.”)
  10. The responses that you receive from the investor are curt and to the point but with little or no explanation for his or her position.
  11. You leave accepting “we’ll call get to you” or words to that effect from the investor that include no definitive next step (call, meeting, exchange of further information).
  12. Your follow up calls and other attempts at contact are returned with a cursory platitude or not at all.

Mysterious Entrepreneurs

Thursday, February 21st, 2019

Ahead of a meeting with a potential investor, to what extent have you thought about the mystery that lies in your entrepreneurial “past” and the relevant application of it to your investor’s immediate future? It is fine to be translucent, probably unhelpful to be opaque and not necessary, to be transparent.

For example, an investor would “think” they know me well after a google search through my website, blog, newsletters, public speaking, media contributions, podcasts, published articles, company accounts, social media, and perhaps talking to others. What they wouldn’t know, or at least they’d have to dig very deep, is many of the experiences that have shaped my understanding of the complexity and ambiguity in pulling off successful private company investments:

  • Lesson No. 1: In October 1982, “bad losers” make terrible investment partners, and friends or acquaintances, who are “bad losers”, are to be avoided at all cost, especially when you are the smallest kid in the class! Trying my hand at an early entrepreneurial endeavour selling horse racing tips (£5 for a series of “Tiny Tips” three Saturday Nap selections), while a teenager at boarding school, I received zero credit if they won and untold grief, bordering on physical abuse, if they lost.
  • Lesson No.2: In March 1992, most business risk management plans make appropriate allowances for catastrophes (hurricanes, earthquakes, wildfires) and with time businesses can rebound but rarely, do they consider the subtle changes in human behaviour and the grave consequences. That thought occurred to me while part of a deposition team seeking to reconcile the impact of a ponytailed fiftysomething psychotherapist, sitting in front of us, who had “groomed” five of his patients to have sex with each other, as therapy. A Boulder, Co. clinic, 8 partners and a practitioner with a 30-year exemplary record, destroyed in an instant, and my employer, his insurer, forced to payout US$10.7 million bucks.
  • Lesson No.3: In late February, 1999, no amount of money can turn an entrepreneur’s vision into an organisational reality without the requisite judgement and talent. Here I was whisked from a dusty landing strip in the Grenadine island of Canouan, to a meeting with Antonio Saladino, the urbane Swiss-Italian founder of a luxury hotel and resort development (today transformed by the stylish hands of Irish tycoon, Dermot Desmond). Flirtatious blondes, Donald Trump, unexplained investors, gargantuan real estate development and the uprooting of an entire fishing island culture all with Grenadine ministerial approval. Very Ian Fleming. Modelled on Porto Cervo, Saladino’s plans went awry over failed assumptions about buyers of the luxury villas, the prime guest market (wealthy North Americans, not the bejewelled Europeans he spoke of), and how to mitigate the impact of commercial airlines suspending scheduled flights (no meaningful plan B or C).

There is a hundreds of other rich and humorous stories I can talk to investors about, many not for publication. All help to shape my skills, behaviours and expertise. What could you use to create a seductive rapport with your ideal investor?

RPM II: The Cornerstone Client Walks

Sunday, April 3rd, 2016

picjumbo.com_HNCK8984

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

In the second in our weekly series of Resilient People & Momentum (“RPM”), James discusses how to lessen the impact of a key client exit on the firm’s profitable growth plans. No seriously, clients aren’t for life!

Situational Overview: The Cornerstone Client Walks – you have done a fabulous job. It is not personal but the buyer has decided that they can live without your product, service and relationship. You have a cashflow problem. You have a potential reputation problem within (direct reports and peers) and outside the firm (customers and business partners). You have a potential employee problem (productivity and morale). You have a potential investor problem (earnings and value). Is your first thought to seek blame or come up with a great response? I’d say in 80% of these situations I have been privy to the former explodes virally.

Resilient People & Momentum Mindset: I subconsciously expect this to happen in a growing business when I least expect it. How I respond is more important than what has happened. I earn others respect by displaying the right mix of skills, behaviour and expertise. I am willing to be intellectually honest about my own performance. I will listen to and respond sensibly to solicited feedback while ignoring unsolicited feedback that is largely for the other party’s benefit.

Resilient People & Momentum Questions:

  1. Cashflow: where can we create more short-term revenue, not where can we take money from?
  2. Reputation: where can we earn more respect (new ideas, reciprocal opportunities, return the favour), not how can I save face or pass the blame?
  3. Employees: where can we more productively deploy and offer more gratifying work to our employees, not who needs to be harangued or worse, fired?
  4. Investors: where can we display and exude greater confidence in our talent and judgement to investors such that a short-term set back, is just that, a blip on a road to riches, not a mind numbing defeat that forces investors to thrown their hands up in the air?
  5. Development: what can I learn from the treasured client’s reasons for the decision to walk away that I can apply for the future benefit of the firm (better client communication), its’ existing clients (prioritising investment) and our prospects (market positioning)?

© James Berkeley 2016. All Rights Reserved.

Success Trumps Ego

Thursday, March 31st, 2016

 

image

 

 

 

 

 

 

If your ego won’t allow you to share credit with those who have contributed substantially to your success, why should others help you in future (clients, investors, peers, employees, business partners etc)?

Successful people always look more successful when their stories reference people often less successful than themselves, who have helped them in vulnerable situations.

Even Donald Trump in his bombastic interviews rarely avoids talking about the “little people”,  who gave him a helping hand. He just leaves you thinking that only he could walk on water!

Many aspiring business managers and execs would be wise to think about whether their conversations, presentations, speeches, media interviews and marketing collaterals sufficiently share the credit with others.

If it is all about “Me, Me, Me”, why should I return your call, stop to talk or consider working together?

Copyright 2016 James Berkeley. All Rights Reserved.

 

 

 

Just An Illusion

Thursday, March 24th, 2016

picjumbo.com_HNCK1089

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Is this a shot from your evening last night, soon to be posted on your instaGLAM account? Today a great many executives, managers, investors and board members are busy trying to be someone that they are not. Fact. They are instantly recognisable by the disparity between the image that they project and what others see.

At a small intimate event last night in London with David Nish, the past CEO of Standard Life and this week appointed as a Non-Executive Director at  HSBC, we discussed the dynamics and consequences of this behaviour.

The dynamics and behaviour are largely the same in businesses of every size. Individuals are prone to projecting views without hard evidence or strong anecdotal information (shout loudest). They are poor listeners (routinely ignore vital feedback). They lack sufficient self-worth in their own talent and judgement (resort to bolstering their credentials with references to famous names). They have a poor level of self-esteem (they are dismissive of others success). They are prone to passive aggressive behaviour to project superiority (constant one-upmanship). They are prone to excessive exaggeration or downright lies about their own success (false claims in bios, CV’s/Resumes). We’ve all met them at various points in our career.

The consequences differ based on the size, priorities and complexity of the organisation. Here are some observations from my own experiences:

An inability to effect a management buyout of a small or family business, where the Founder’s behaviour results in management never acquiring the skills, traits or expertise to run the business in his or her absence.

A loss of respect for a private investor’s judgement amongst their peers and future co-investment opportunities when they make wild, unfounded claims to be invested in the “next unicorn“. Ridiculous, of course but sadly all too often true.

Raging management distrust in the Board when a non-executive director relays unsubstantiated “insider” claims from a key client, institutional investor or employees about the manager’s negative performance without hard evidence or strong anecdotal information.

A destruction of goodwill amongst analysts and the media when the newly appointed CEO of an investment bank, self-invested with “superman” powers, promises near instant changes to the business model that his predecessors have taken decades to create.

The world is littered with people trying to be someone that they are not. Facebook, Instagram and Twitter couldn’t survive if that human need dissipated. We all have a reputation that precedes us in the hyper-connected world we live in. Reinvention, acquiring new skills and educating others is something that we must constantly commit to but without absolute credibility (tangible results and visible behaviour), it is just an illusion.

© James Berkeley 2016. All Rights Reserved.

Referral Momentum

Thursday, March 10th, 2016

A trusted source sends you a referral. How you handle the solicited or unsolicited help says more about your own professionalism and value than the results that often arise from the introduction? Your “responsiveness” to the referral source (speed of sending a “thank you”, time taken to set up a follow up call or meeting). Your “respect” for the referral source (time, care and attention given to the referral). Your future “reciprocal value” to the referral source (the increased chances of more valuable help being sent your way).

Collectively, there is a momentum which can positively build and strengthen trusting peer-level relationships, have a “blip” effect on your relationship or indeed have a negative impact. That ball is largely in your court.

Most people don’t do this well because they lack a focused and disciplined process and structure. Ask yourself, “Are we suitably set up to impress our referral sources?” If not, “what must change immediately?” A week’s unanswered call or return email,  an inability to leave a voicemail message or a failure to update the referral source on the progress, is not unfortunate, it is amateur.

Ironically, friends, colleagues and business partners who know you well are in my observation some of the worst culprits.

© James Berkeley 2016. All Rights Reserved.

 

Conviction and Reinvention

Monday, March 7th, 2016

IMG_6840

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

I have long been fascinated by how people and businesses apply “conviction” (beliefs, investment, action) when there is an immediate requirement for “reinvention”.

In 1999, opposite where I worked on Hollywood Road in Hong Kong was a large commercial real estate company, whose business was fitting out and renting shared service offices. For many years it had a unremarkable name and neon sign over the 1960s building, overnight it added the sobriquet “.com”. Curious I asked a friend who worked in the building what was happening, “Oh the Chinese owner thought because tech is red-hot right now, why not change the name of the company. Don’t worry as tenants we have seen no changes.”

Now you might not be as brazen in convincing your target audience à la Donald Trump and Mitt Romney that your polar opposite views are instantly credible but there is a mindset change needed first to kick start reinvention. Here is 3 simple questions, apply it to any situation you personally or the organisation are experiencing:

  1. What are the beliefs that inform my convictions today about how I and/or the business needs to look in 12 months time? (relationships with clients/investors/ employees/regulators, changing customer base, financial condition, valuable and profitable offerings, discretionary time and so forth)
  2. How do I apply those convictions today to where I/we plan to invest tomorrow? (capital deployment, people, innovation, strategy implementation)
  3. How do I best put today’s convictions into action tomorrow? (priorities, organisational structure, process, exemplars, skills, behaviours, expertise, technologies, accountabilities, rewards system, communication and feedback and so forth)

I can barely think of a sector where the nature of work is not changing dramatically today. With it comes fear (irrelevant, loss of clients or even, unemployed) and opportunity (new investment in new products and services, new markets and new roles).

People believe what they see, not what they hear or feel. If you really want to convince me today that you are serious about reinvention, I want to see immediate changes of attitudes and behaviour amongst influential figures in the business and new, impressive results fast.

If you are willing to be intellectually honest, click on the link below. Ask yourself where do our current attempts sit on the chart and where do they need to be in the future. The distance between the two points is indicative of the small step or giant leap your business and key people need to take.

 

Conviction and Reinvention pv only

Endless needs analysis informing our future strategy (AIG), managers preoccupied for hours creating and talking to the media about our “new culture” (Anthony Jenkins at Barclays) or changes to the plaque over the building door won’t cut it for customers, investors, employees and regulators, however, well intentioned. It isn’t easy but I need to see in your actions that you really believe what you are saying, not merely spouting platitudes to buy time or protect your ego.

© James Berkeley 2016. All Rights Reserved.

Interview with Me: Economia

Wednesday, February 17th, 2016

Nick Martindale, a senior reporter with economia, the “go to” publication for the global accounting profession and their clients, interviewed me on the logic and emotional challenges top managers face when they decide to “go global”. Specifically, the fears that distorts their decision-making and the consequences for their growth objectives. The fears are largely similar in large and small firms, what is different is the impact the consequences may have on top line revenue growth, profit, cashflow, brand perception, employees, investor relations and clients.

http://economia.icaew.com/finance/february-2016/foreign-riches

 

Tell The Truth: You Don’t Know Your Clients Well

Monday, February 15th, 2016

We think we know our clients but many of us are kidding ourselves or unwilling to be intellectually honest. If the objective is to profitably grow our business, we can help ourselves by having a finer understanding of the logic and emotion that drives our clients’ decision-making. I am talking about the individuals with the ability to approve, fund, veto or set major strategic initiatives for their organisations and the tactics to implement it.

You don’t accomplish that in a mid or large client organisation by placing yourself in a subservient position to a Risk Manager, an HR Director or a mid level banker. When did they last sit in, and contribute to, the firm’s strategy meeting? How would they be privy to the inner most thoughts of the firm’s top management, the Board and its’ owners? How would they be in a position to influence those individuals’ decisions?

If you must exclusively hang out with these shared service experts or mid-level managers consider the risks. You are placing your future well-being and financial condition at the behest of individuals, who rarely get “air time” with the ultimate decision-maker(s). They have a vague understanding of the competing priorities in the executive office. You are left to sort through the information they wish to share with you, their interpretation of events and their biases. So what is the alternative?

Shoot For The Top.

A senior figure at a Big Four consulting practice admitted to me “I sit across the table from C-level execs all the time but I don’t really know them.” Another, Vice-Chair of a market-leading brokerage and advisory firm, revealed how distant he and his colleagues are from the strategic decision-making process at major European insurance companies, yet they have billion dollar trading relationship. Faced with increased competitive threats, both individuals talked about the increasingly precarious position their organisations are in. In both cases, the businesses haven’t placed sufficient accountability on key people to build relationships with the right people and provide them with immediate and impressive value. Rather they have stayed in the transactional layer of the firm, cultivating relationships with mid level managers, convincing themselves that getting closer to these individuals will enhance their well-being (improved top line revenue, happier clients, stronger brand).

Getting There Fast.

Here is what my best clients do,

  1. Identify who those key people are in Board, ownership and management positions that you ideally need a relationship with to exploit exciting and anticipated needs?
  2. Who do they hang out with? (peers, friends, acquaintances, media and so forth)
  3. Where and with whom do they like to be seen? (professional, personal interests, charity etc.)
  4. Where do they speak, publish and support events?
  5. What are they passionate about? (hobbies, innovation, people and so forth)
  6. How might you meet them and increase your prospects of establishing a peer level relationship? (referral, charitable or professional association boards, shared experiences etc.)
  7. How might you provide immediate value? (a name, an idea, a sponsor, a success practice and so forth)
  8. How might you parlay that into a continuous conversation with reciprocal value? (each time you meet, you both leave with exciting ideas and impressive value, looking ahead to the next social or business gathering)

I find there are a great many people who “get” and studiously study the logic. However they fail due to poor credibility (entry path, lack of substance), an inability to build a rapport (intellect, social skills and chemistry weak) or a lack of trust in themselves (blow up the relationship with their transactional buyer). They can be coached or mentored but many are reluctant or their boss doesn’t see it as a priority. Lo and behold the organisation will forever be at risk to client strategic decisions that it has zero control over and an unwillingness to influence.

© James Berkeley 2016. All Rights Reserved.